NIV
New International Version · 1978 (rev. 2011)
He was with God in the beginning.
7 words · Balance of accuracy and readability
John 1:2 — Compare Translations
Read this verse in 6 Bible translations — from word-for-word to thought-for-thought.
Dynamic equivalence
KJV
King James Version · 1611
The same was in the beginning with God.
8 words · Formal / word-for-word
ESV
English Standard Version · 2001 (rev. 2016)
He was in the beginning with God.
7 words · Essentially literal
NLT
New Living Translation · 1996 (rev. 2015)
He existed in the beginning with God.
7 words · Thought-for-thought clarity
MSG
The Message · 2002
in readiness for God from day one.
7 words · Contemporary paraphrase
NASB
New American Standard Bible · 1971 (rev. 2020)
He was in the beginning with God.
7 words · Most literal English translation
Translation Length Comparison
NIV
7 words
KJV
8 words
ESV
7 words
NLT
7 words
MSG
7 words
NASB
7 words
Frequently Asked Questions
How many Bible translations are there for John 1:2?
Bible Verse Randomizer offers John 1:2 in 6 translations: New International Version, King James Version, English Standard Version, New Living Translation, The Message, New American Standard Bible. Each uses a different translation philosophy — from word-for-word (KJV, ESV, NASB) to thought-for-thought (NIV, NLT) to paraphrase (MSG).
Which translation of John 1:2 is best?
No single translation is "best" — it depends on your purpose. For deep study, use the ESV or NASB (word-for-word). For devotional reading, the NIV balances accuracy and readability. The NLT and MSG are excellent for understanding the general meaning in modern English. Comparing multiple translations helps grasp the full richness of the text.
What is the difference between literal and dynamic Bible translations?
Literal (formal equivalence) translations like KJV, ESV, and NASB translate word-for-word from the original Hebrew/Greek. Dynamic equivalence translations like NIV and NLT translate thought-for-thought for clarity. The MSG is a paraphrase that captures the spirit in contemporary language. Each approach has strengths — that's why comparing translations is valuable.